Turtle Tattoo Designs

Hi,

I recently traveled to Canada by land for 1 week . When I went to Canada the canadian authorities did not take my I 94. When I returned from canada, the US officials did not give me a new I 94, will this be a problem ?

Thank you for your time.

My I-485/I-140 were filed on Jul 2, 2007 (I-140 approved in 9/2007). I possess an EAD valid till Sep 2010 and AP valid till Aug 2009. I lost my job (H1B) in late January. I have a family emergency compelling me to travel to India for a week (starting Saturday next week 04/04/2009). Will there be any problem in terms of using my AP to re-enter the U.S? An early reply would be appreciated. Thank You very much in advance.

P.S: I do not have a job yet.

Whoever you choose, please do not go to Keshab Raj Seadie. His office is at 146 West 29th Street, NY. Phone: (212) 571-6002. Aptly named website: greencardmaker.com should be renamed greencardsucker.com

He is another worthless desi lawyer. Stay away from him! Only interested in taking your money. Poor service and once you have parted with your money good luck getting any timely response by phone or email. I have had very bad experience dealing with his office and don't be fooled by recommendations on his website saying he is very responsive etc.

As long as you meet the requirements for EB5 (500K in approved areas/ 1M in rest)

you should be good. They don't need the 140 and if you haven't applied for 485 then it doesn't matter.

Also did u know it is a conditional GC (just like when u marry USC you get a conditional GC) after 2 yrs you need to apply for removal of conditions by proving you met all the EB5 requirements.

Totally irrelevant to this forum. Administrator please review this thread.

Hi guys
thanks for the info. Since he got I 485 approved the GC status already began for him or only on receipt of GC his Green card status begins.
Which is correct? Any help.
thanks

You can count me in...

By the way it makes more sense to meet Senator Arlen Specter since he is also on Senate Judiciary committee...

Committee Members (http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm)

Hi,
In DS-156 form there is an item 36 which says "Has anyone ever filed an immigration visa petition on your behalf",
What should be entered for H4 visa holder whose 485 has been filed.
And if we have to say "Yes" to this question , then whose name should be mentioned in "If Yes ,Who?", should it be the spouse name or the spouse company name ?


Thanks

This will be good to showcase the need for talent (read as speed up reforms)

Ander's crop does look better. It removes the clouds that were making the diagonal eye path to the lower right. :)

Thanks Bobzi !!!

I got a response from my lawyer too and he said that there are no issues with this - she can change her job without a problem. Thanks everyone for the responses.

Anybody??:(

You can request assistance from the airline. My elderly mother travels alone twice a year to visit me and the respective airline are always more than helpful, meeting her off the plane and making sure she knows which gate to go to etc.

On a funny note she was most offended that they felt a wheelchair was appropriate and insisted that is only for old people. She is 77.

Adorama has it listed. They don't say whether or not it's in stock.
I recently made the move to digital by purchasing a D70. I'm interested in purchasing the Nikon SC-29 cord for use with a SB-800 on a Stroboframe quick-flip frame. I like the idea of the added flexibility that the SC-29 gives over the SC-28 because of the additional autofocus lamp.

However, after I ordered the SC-29 from Etronics.com (who listed this product as being in stock), they contacted me a day later to say that it was actually out of stock. Furthermore, they said that Nikon had discontinued the product, and that though they tried, they were not able to obtain one of these cables through another channel.

Has anyone heard about Nikon canceling the SC-29? That doesn't make any sense to me. I've seen these for sale on e-bay, but that is through a Japanese reseller, and the shipping takes a couple of weeks (not to mention, it's not an authorized Nikon USA dealer).

Any other information or input about the SC-29?

Thanks so much!

Jonathan Van Antwerp

I believe it is 180 days before your H1 expires.
It doesnt matter how many years are left on your H1.

I received this private message from Sledge_Hammer. This is the person, who gets irritated when someone writes "u" instead of "you". He also has issues with other's control and understanding of English language. Over here, he has given me full exposure of his command over English language. Thank you --
************************************************** ************
From: Sledge_Hammer
Your life story!
You're a fucking son of a rotten whore that was fucked both ways by a rabid dog on the streets of Dharavi slums. While the dog was fucking your mother she was having such a good time that she even offered to lick the semen off of the dog's penis once it was done. Of course, while all of this was going on, your dad was getting ass fucked by your uncle, your grandfather, his father, and all the slum dwellers.

Nine months later you were born. You are the product of your mom's eggs and the rabid dog's semen.

Have a good day!

WOAH, LOL i can just imagine the hindi/punjabi version of it!:D

My attorney has asked for the I-485 to be printed:

double sided with Flip to Top option.

Did anyone else do the same?

http://www.uslawnet.com/Englishhome/News/messages/234.htm

Hi,

I know there has been lot of discussions on things to do and not to do after changing jobs - but seems like there is no definitive conclusion. Thought of getting opinion on following:
(i) Generally people suggest to send G28 to change the lawyer representation - this helps in tracking what is going on without missing any RFE's.
(ii) Regarding AC21 letter informing USCIS there are contradicting advice even from lawyers - some say that dont do anything until they issue an RFE. Thinking here is that we would attract USCIS attention by sending an AC21 letter that could potentially delay. By not sending the letter they might just approve without any questions.

Based on this, I initially thought of sending just G28 but not AC21 letter. But once we send G28 to change lawyer representation, my application get USCIS's attention anyway - so I am thinking why not send AC21 letter as well as a back up.

Any opinions?
Thanks.


You may want to change lawyers for many reasons including personal dissatisfaction, lawyers messing up, high fees , and more... I do not think this will attract so much attention in comparison.Just my thought.

Thanks for the help Kirupa. It works great now!

It is possible this can occur, but rare, A while back there was an article @ Murthy's website on this. They have to check with their Attorney to ensure there is no other issue in future. It depends on when the application was adjucated, whether prior to retrogression or not. The communication can be at a later date